Boolean trouble
- Thread starter Oval
- Start date
What are the 600 section in the shelled plane object for?
Cheers
Frank
Cheers
Frank
It's for the better bending (after objects intersection). But it's really not the problem for this case.
Helmut
0
Make the extrusion editable and optimise. Seems to work properly after that. Maybe some fishy topology which bamboozles the late George Boole :tongue:
PS:
* If you check the object analysis prior and after the optimisation you will notice a slight reduction in the numbers. I could not see any obvious mess, but I only briefly checked the geometry.
PS:
* If you check the object analysis prior and after the optimisation you will notice a slight reduction in the numbers. I could not see any obvious mess, but I only briefly checked the geometry.
Last edited:
It won´t help with the depth section. You need more geometry there as well; see image.
Cheers
Frank
Attachments
Last edited:
Helmut
0
* You may also consider a modular approach.
* In my trivial example I use a hexagonal tube, the outer perimeter of which is tweaked into a rectangle. This is modified by a standard array.
* The panel is just a plane plus some minor fiddles plus a shell.
* Your object seems to be symmetrical on two axes, so you just need to model one quarter.
* I have left some gaps to show the individual elements. Of course, I have no idea of your aims, so this may be totally useless.
* In my trivial example I use a hexagonal tube, the outer perimeter of which is tweaked into a rectangle. This is modified by a standard array.
* The panel is just a plane plus some minor fiddles plus a shell.
* Your object seems to be symmetrical on two axes, so you just need to model one quarter.
* I have left some gaps to show the individual elements. Of course, I have no idea of your aims, so this may be totally useless.
Attachments
You are right, Frank. Got and resolved micro flip-flop lines in SVG spline.