Locations by the numbers.
Hey Guys,
Is there anyway to remove unwanted tessellation lines from the face of an extrusion or polygon disc as shown in the attached file?
I have tried deleting all of the sections on the face and using "fill hole" but it simply will not do it, and even if it did, I bet it would give me similar results.
I just need a continuous uninterrupted surface for this build and the extrusion won't provide it.
Why not just build a polygon object you may wonder? Well, I did this and it worked great. The problem is, is that I can't find a good way to control my points so that I am certain of their location. Which is why I did the profile in Illustrator and then extruded it, because I can get exact point positioning in Illustrator.
So what I am asking is, if someone knows a way that I can re-tessellate a surface to my liking, or tell me if there is some way to control points by the numbers (coordinates, etc.) so that I can get the transform tool to move to an exact numeric position, or preferably both.
Thanks in advance gentlemen,
Rick
Hey Guys,
Is there anyway to remove unwanted tessellation lines from the face of an extrusion or polygon disc as shown in the attached file?
I have tried deleting all of the sections on the face and using "fill hole" but it simply will not do it, and even if it did, I bet it would give me similar results.
I just need a continuous uninterrupted surface for this build and the extrusion won't provide it.
Why not just build a polygon object you may wonder? Well, I did this and it worked great. The problem is, is that I can't find a good way to control my points so that I am certain of their location. Which is why I did the profile in Illustrator and then extruded it, because I can get exact point positioning in Illustrator.
So what I am asking is, if someone knows a way that I can re-tessellate a surface to my liking, or tell me if there is some way to control points by the numbers (coordinates, etc.) so that I can get the transform tool to move to an exact numeric position, or preferably both.
Thanks in advance gentlemen,
Rick